The goal of social protection for judges in Ukraine

It is indicated that in a social, legal and democratic state, any activity regulated by legislation, consistent with the principles of law, must be characterized certain goal. This goal should characterized, firstly, clarity unambiguity (in order to comply requirements principle rule law terms certainty); secondly, scientificity (strategic orientations contradict scientificity, therefore do not agree science, economic, psychological, sociological other sciences, may harm provision human rights, order, pose risks for social types security) , which ensures relevance, adequacy, effectiveness rationality such Compliance these contributes fact subject who carries out relevant activity, taking into account its purpose, clearly understands motives, grounds, conditions, procedure, consequences actions inaction within limits this also able predict correct their timely manner connection changes normative or factual circumstances reality, etc. Therefore, without clarifying purpose it impossible understand content reduces significanceThe article defines protection judges Ukraine. In broader context, create appropriate conditions socially safe existence individuals, whom measures are directed. To refine definition, author conducts comprehensive analysis general approaches (positive, negative, combined) concept “the protection” evaluates advantages disadvantages. Within framework combined approach, argued Ukraine twofold: mitigate minimize negative effects various associated work judges; establish set judges’ (including retired judges) meet standards aligned dignity specific nature work. The emphasizes highlights primary practical family members) feel secure. Consequently, aim restore maintain an adequate level security individuals cannot considered genuine measures. jeopardizes independence autonomy. Moreover, if aimed at ensuring fail yield positive outcomes, suggests ineffectiveness inadequacy necessitates reevaluation factors impede judges.